Thursday, February 13, 2020

Future Armor Rearm System (FARS) - concept from 80s




Modern weapon systems are designed to fight and deliver maxi mum firepower, but they lack the ability to carry large amounts of munitions aboard or to reload rapidly to perform sustained combat operations. Each combat unit must return to a resupply point for replenishment to keep it an effective fighting force. Of all these supplies, ammunition is perhaps the most critical, and the task of resupplying ammunition is becoming ever more complex.

Presently, the world’s most lethal main battle tank, the M1A1 Abrams, must be rearmed one round at a time through the top of the turret, while the Army's howitzers must load four separate components — fuze, primer, propellant, and projectile — for each artillery round. The M2 Bradley fighting vehicle's ammunition stowage and rearm methods need improvement to sustain intense combat operations. The Cobra and Apache helicopters must spend considerable time on the ground to rearm. The concept of rapid rearm and resupply requires integration and optimization of the combat soldier's needs in relation to his weapon and those of the logistician and his resupply system.

To enhance this critical element of warfighting, several advanced technology programs are underway at Picatinny Arsenal, N.J., to improve weapon system rearmament. New systems in development for armor, artillery, infantry, and aviation promise a new era of rapid battlefield rearmament.


Armor units resupply during lulls in combat, or when necessary to replenish combat loads. This generally occurs behind the forward line, and the preferred method is to rearm from a resupply vehicle. Rearmament is usually carried out in the open through the crew hatch, exposing the weapon and crew to overhead and small-arms fire. Studies by the Armor School indicate the combat vehicle is particularly vulnerable at this time, and the exposure time is significantly increased when in an NBC environment.

Meanwhile, new developments in ammunition and armor protection and continuing threat improvements in armor protection have dictated increased weapon and ammo performance. This results in heavier or more sensitive ammunition, such as the 120-mm combustible cartridge case round that was fielded for the Abrams tank. In conjunction with these concerns, developing a rearm and resupply system capable of efficiently supporting the armor system in the forward area is our major challenge. The Project Manager for Ammunition Logistics (PM-AM MOLOG) has established a program, the Future Armor Rearm System (FARS), to meet deficiencies inrearming armor units. The FARS program is intended to develop, integrate, and demonstrate technologiescapable of moving present and future one- and two-pieced ammunition from a rearm vehicle into the bustle of the future tank. This program is under the direction of the Project Manager for Ammunition Logistics, and includes representatives of the Human Engineering Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Tooele Army Depot.

Concepts for handling and transferring ammunition were conceptualized in 1989, and a demonstration is scheduled in conjunction with the Advanced Tank Cannon (ATAC) System in FY 92 and the Tank-Automotive Command CATTB in FY 94. The concept calls for a module mounted on the rear of the MLRS medium-type chassis. A bearing and drive motor mechanism allow 360-degree rotation of the module. In the travel mode, the module boom is oriented over the chassis cab. The rotating module per mits the rearm vehicle to load ammo into the tank from either side or over the rear deck (see figure 1). Rotation of the module and manipulation of the extendable boom are controlled by an operator from the front seat of the vehicle cab. Using video and sensing devices, the operator can align the boom with the tank's rear rearm port, thus permitting the boom to "dock" with the tank. The operator can select and transfer ammunition from the cab.


A series of three rotary carousel magazine storage cells within the module hold either a projectile or two propellant charges for the new two-piece ATAC 140-mm ammunition. There are twenty projectiles in each of the lower two carousels, and forty propellant charges in the top carousel (see figure 2); thus each stack contains forty complete rounds. Stacks of carousels are to be placed in tandem allowing the module to hold 80 or 120, depending on the module length.


A single extractor mechanism with powered rollers (see figure 3) permits the removal of a cartridge component from any cell in the carousel. The operator moves the carousel until the desired component is above the extractor mechanism. The extrac tor can pass ammo from stack to stack, or from one cell to a lift table located in the module in line with the transfer boom (see figure 2). The lift table takes the component from the carousels, then moves in pitch and elevation to align with the conveyors located in the transfer boom. The conveyors move the ammo through the articulated boom to the tank, where it is passed through the docking port to the awaiting cell of the tank autoloader.

Exploring tomorrow's issues today, with emerging technologies, is just another way the Project Manager for Ammunition Logistics provides professional and imaginative solutions to ammunition logistics.

A source - magazine Armor, July-August 1991



* * *

Another hydraulic system developed at ORNL was the Future Armor Rearm System (FARS), shown in Fig. 2. The FARS was designed and built with the assistance of Tooele Army Depot. The FARS was developed to allow the Army to rearm its new M1A1 tanks without exposing the soldier to the hazards of the battlefield. The FARS hydraulically actuated arm served several purposes: (1) to dock with the empty tank; (2) to be a communication link between the tank and the FARS rearm vehicle; and (3) to transfer the ammunition between the tank and the FARS vehicle. Control of the FARS arm proved to be a challenge in achieving the fine motion required to dock with the tank rearm port. Management of the interaction forces between the arm and the docking port during contact was proven to be a hydraulic system challenge. -Ultimately, interaction forces were controlled by developing a compliant rearm port on the tank. Flexibility and low natural frequency would be a problem with the FARS arm if it were moved quickly. To avoid exciting the arm's structural dynamics, however, the joints are moved slowly.



Source - Hydraulic Manipulator Design, Analysis, and Control at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 1997.


* * *


Technology for the Future Battlefield


D uring Operation Desert Storm, the ground war lasted only four days, rmnirmzing the need for U.S. armored forces to reload ammunition. However, if battle conditions had been different or if Iraq had made good on its threat to use nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) weapons, the process of manually reloading ammunition into armored fighting vehicles would have been a much more dangerous task. This problem was noticed long before Operation Desert Storm, however. Since the midl970s the U.S. Army has been looking at the difficulties of rearming armored and mechanized vehicles on the battlefield in light of various combat scenarios and computer models. Under some of these battle conditions, the necessity of manually reloading ammunition could limit the effectiveness of U.S. armor.

Currently, the world's most lethal battle tank, the MIAl Abrams, must be rearmed one piece of ammunition at a time through a hatch on top of the tank. Under battle conditions, when the tank is running low on ammunition, the tank commander asks the base to send a Heavy Enhanced Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT, pronounced him-it) to meet with the tank well behind the fighting line. When the tank and HEMTT meet, the tank hatch is opened, the HEMTT crew and tank crew dismount, and ammunition reloading begins. Crew members remove the tank ammunition from storage cans and pass it up to the top of the tank where other soldiers lower it down through the hatch. Inside the tank, a soldier places the ammunition into storage honeycombs. Under the best conditions, this procedure is a tiresome task; under battlefield conditions it is also dangerous because the crew and equipment may be exposed to deadly weapon fire and NBC agents.

ORNL's Role

An ORNL group is part of a national team working to improve the safety and efficiency of this essential element of armored warfare by developing critical technology for automated reloading of armored vehicles. This technology will be demonstrated using the Future Armor Rearm System (FARS). Under the project guidance of ORNL's Robotics and Process Systems Division (RPSD), staff members from RPSD, the Central Engineering Division at Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., and ORNL's Plant and Equipment Division have joined together to help develop automated reloading technology.

The development of the FARS technology is sponsored by the U.S. Army's Project Manager for Ammunition Logistics (PM-AMMOLOG) through the Work for Others Office. The charter of PM-AMMOLOG is to identify logistics problems in the U.S. Army's ammunition chain and find solutions. Ammunition reloading for heavy armored systems is a proven logistical problem within the Army's armored systems. "The FARS program," says project sponsor Nelson Gravenstede, "is intended to develop, integrate, and demonstrate technologies capable of moving ammunition from a rearm vehicle into the tank."


To develop and demonstrate the FARS technology, PM-AMMOLOG has put together a team consisting of personnel from ORNL and several other Army facilities. The team members were selected based on their individual expertise. The ORNL group was chosen based on our experience with robotic and remote systems, our advanced controls and integration capabilities, and our ability to design systems to operate in hazardous environments, such as nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities and outer space. Other team members include the Human Engineering Laboratory at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, and the Tooele Army Depot at Tooele, Utah. We are also collaborating with Benet Weapons Laboratory of Watervliet, New York, designer of the autoloader that will fit inside the advanced tank. We are working with these groups to develop the many subsystems of the FARS automated reloading system. ORNL is responsible for the ammunition handling and storage system, the overall controls, systems integration, and final technology demonstration.

A Look at the FARS

The F ARS will consist of a tracked, armored chassis and a specialized mission module. The mission module will house systems for storing and transferring ammunition into the tank bustle. Automated reloading, which will be demonstrated with FARS technology at ORNL, will not only ease the manual burden on the soldier but will also provide a safer, faster, and more efficient means of reloading heavy armored systems. The use ofF ARS technology will eliminate the possibility of exposing soldiers to enemy fue or NBC agents during the reloading operation.

With the F ARS technology, when a tank is running low on ammunition, the tank commander will communicate that need to the base, which will send a F ARS to meet the tank. Because the F ARS will be on a tracked chassis, it will be able to negotiate the same sort of terrain as tanks, and, with its armored protection, the F ARS will be able to meet the tank closer to the fighting line than the HEMTT. The FARS operator will approach the tank and dock the transfer arm to the port located on the tank bustle. While performing the docking operation, the operators will stay safely inside the FARS cab, relying on camera viewing and joy-stick control of the transfer arm to remotely guide it. Once the docking is completed, the connection between the tank and the F ARS will be purged to remove any possible contamination by NBC agents during reloading, and a communication link with the tank will indicate when ammunition transfer can begin.

Ammunition will be housed in the FARS in individual storage cells. These cells will be mounted on a rotating carousel to allow access to any desired type and sequence of ammunition. The tank commander will be able to choose from several types of ammunition, depending on the nature of the target. For example, different types of ammunition are fired at heavily armored and lightly armored targets. When the tank commander specifies the desired combination of ammunition, the PARS will send the ammunition from the carousels to a lift table and through the transfer arm into the bustle of the tank. Once inside the tank, the round will be transferred into an autoloader mechanism that will store ammunition and feed it into the main gun.

Benefits of Automated

Reloading Technology Automated reloading technology being developed will provide many benefits over the current manual method. It will increase safety, reduce the size of armor support crews, and increase the battlefield availability of armored fighting vehicles.

Soldier safety will be improved because crews from both vehicles can remain under full armor protection during the entire reloading process. The technology also protects the systems from NBC contamination. Also, the soldiers are less vulnerable because automatic reloading is faster than the current method.

The second main area to benefit is crew size. The current method is labor intensive and lengthy. Soldiers from both crews must dismount and handle the ammunition as they move it from HEMTT storage, to the tank, down the hatch, and into the tank storage system. Automated ammunition reloading will reduce crew size because, once the PARS leaves the supply base, the ammunition never again has to be manually handled.


The third major benefit of automated reloading is improved battlefield availability for the fighting vehicles. Because the automated reloading vehicle is armored and tracked, it can move closer to the fighting line than the current reloading vehicle. The goal for the entire automated reloading sequence is 10 minutes or less, a significant improvement over the current manual method. Combining the increase in loading speed and the ability to perform reloading operations in closer proximity to the fighting line would result in approximately a 20% increase in the number of tanks on the battlefield.

Demonstration of FARS Technology

Although the FARS concepts apply to a fully developed rearm vehicle, the demonstration will concentrate on the critical areas of technology. A fullsize advanced tank will be included in the FARS technology demonstration, which will take place at ORNL in the fall of 1992. The FARS will approach, dock, communicate, and transfer ammunition into the tank's automated loading system. The technology developed with the FARS will feed into the Army's Advanced System Modernization program for the Future Armor Resupply Vehicle as a fielded system. The FARS team members have dedicated many hours of company and personal time to the project. Bob Oliver of the Central Engineering Division made scale FARS and tank models on his own time. These models have been used in briefings to top Army offtcials and others. For his initiative and effort, Oliver received special recognition from the PM-AMMOLOG Deputy Director. "Building military models has been one of my hobbies for many years," says Oliver. "Being named principal engineer for a full-scale prototype like this has been the highlight of my career at ORNL."


The FARS project results will demonstrate a variety of new and advanced technologies for the Army community. The control system currently under development will enable the F ARS operator to access any desired piece of ammunition by coordinating the various systems into an integrated operation. Rick Glassell, an RPSD controls engineer, has helped design the control system for the FARS. "Developing the controls system required to coordinate this many different operations has been a challenge," says Glassell. "Communicating with the tank and remotely controlling the ammunition transfer ann are two of the major goals we are working on for the demonstration."

The ammunition handling and transfer system, which was designed by ORNL, is the first of its kind to be able to remotely handle ammunition produced using the Army's advanced combustible-case ammunition technology. The ability to remotely dock and communicate with the tank is also a technological advancement. Systems exist that assist with reloading specific types of ammunition; however, these systems require a soldier in the rearming loop to complete the operation. The fully automated FARS, from the storage cells to the firing of rounds from the tank's cannon, will be a technological first.

The Army plans to employ FARS technology after the year 2000 on its next generation of tanks. However, the advanced technology being developed by the FARS program will likely have applications in other areas of military rearming. The innovative application of advanced technology to F ARS has been a significant technical challenge. It has required a total integrated systems approach using a broad range of ORNL expertise and capabilities, particularly in remote systems, telerobotics, and advanced automation. The FARS team and ORNL staff members are strongly contributing to meeting the technology needs of the U.S. military.






Source - Oak Ridge National Laboratory REVIEW, Vol.25, No.1. 1992

Friday, February 7, 2020

Walk around of newest Ukrainian RK-360MTs Neptun coastal missile system

Walk around of newest Ukrainian RK-360MTs Neptun coastal missile system with R-360 cruise missiles.

The Defense Express Media & Consulting Company has released new footage of the newest Ukrainian RK-360MTs Neptun coastal missile system with R-360 cruise missiles in stunning detail.

The Neptune is a coastal missile system designed to engage enemy surface fighting ships and auxiliaries vessels both single and belonging to Task Forces.

The system consists of an RCP-360 self-propelled command control and communications centre, USPU-360 self-propelled launchers, a TZM-360 transport and reloader machine and special cargo vehicle.

The coastal missile system is capable of hitting targets at ranges up to 280 kilometers at any time and under any weather conditions. The R-360 missile weighs 870 kg; the weight of its warhead is 150 kg; its launch speed is about 900 km/h.

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Rheinmetall to supply laser duel simulators for Puma infantry fighting vehicles


Rheinmetall is to supply AGDUS laser duel simulators for the Puma IFV, contributing to the combat readiness of German mechanised infantry units.


Each AGDUS set consists of laser detectors arrayed around the vehicle as well as eye-safe lasers capable of simulating the effects of the Puma’s principal weapon systems, i.e. the automatic cannon, machinegun and MELLS antitank guided missile (Picture source: Rheinmetall)

Press Release, Düsseldorf, 03 February 2020: Rheinmetall will soon be supplying the German Bundeswehr with simulation technology that will enable highly realistic training of mechanised infantry units equipped with the Puma IFV. The total of the contract could be as high as €142 million, including value added tax.

At the end of 2019, Rheinmetall received order to this effect from the consortium responsible for the Puma for the AGDUS duel simulator, which had in turn been awarded the contract by the Bundeswehr on 20 December. To begin with, a pre-series of six systems will be developed and integrated. For Rheinmetall, the order value (booked in January 2020) comes to €54 million with VAT. Once the system is ready for full-scale serial production, an option exists for equipping 252 infantry fighting vehicles. This would result in an additional order for Rheinmetall worth around €88 million, including VAT, bringing the total value of the AGDUS contract to around €142 million, once again including VAT.


Each AGDUS set consists of laser detectors arrayed around the vehicle as well as eye-safe lasers capable of simulating the effects of the Puma’s principal weapon systems, i.e. the automatic cannon, machine gun and MELLS antitank guided missile. The laser algorithms are programmed to assure ballistically exact simulation of shots and hits. The AGDUS also enables simulation of the Puma IFV’s turret-independent secondary weapon system, or TSWA, as well as the vehicle’s self-defence systems. As a result, extremely realistic exercises can be conducted and evaluated at the German Army Combat Training Centre and other training facilities.

Rheinmetall’s Vehicle Systems and Electronics Solutions divisions will bring their respective expertise to bear in completing this order, with most of the work being performed at Group locations in Bremen and Unterlüß. True to the motto “Train as you fight!”, the AGDUS-equipped Puma IFV will significantly enhance the combat readiness of Germany’s mechanised infantry corps

US Army Active Protection Systems (APS) Program summary

Executive Summary

• In FY17, in support of the European Deterrence Initiative, the Army initiated an expedited installation and characterization of three Active Protection Systems (APS): the Rafael Trophy APS for the Army Abrams M1A2 and Marine Corps M1A1 tanks, the Artis Iron Curtain APS for the Stryker family of vehicles, and the Elbit Iron Fist – Light Decoupled APS for the Bradley family of vehicles.

• The selected APS technologies are non-developmental items intended to improve the survivability of ground combat vehicles against anti-tank guided missiles, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), and recoilless rifle threats by using a kinetic “hard kill” mechanism to intercept and disrupt/defeat theincoming threat.

• The Army tested the APS in two phases. Phase I assessed technology maturity, performance, and integration. Phase II supported the urgent materiel release (UMR).


Trophy APS
• In FY19, the Army completed Phase II of the TrophyAPS testing. DOT&E will summarize the demonstrated performance in a combined OT&E/LFT&E report in 2QFY20 to support the UMR. 
• Based on the demonstrated performance, the Army issued a directed requirement to procure and install Trophy APS systems on Abrams for a total of four Armored Brigade Combat Teams, by the end of FY20.

Iron Fist – Light Decoupled APS
• In FY18, the Army completed Phase I Iron Fist APS testing on the Bradley. This test supported the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC) meeting on November 30, 2018, where the Army decided to move forward with the Phase II Iron Fist – Light Decoupled APS program. Phase II testing is currently scheduled for FY21.

Stryker APS
• In FY18, the Army completed Phase I Iron Curtain APS testing on the Stryker. In FY19, the Army pursued and tested two additional Stryker APS solutions: Advanced Modular Armor Protection – Active Defense System by UBT/Rheinmetall and the Trophy Light system by DRS/Rafael. The Army has not selected any of these solutions due to the demonstrated performance and the systems maturity.

Trophy APS
• The Trophy APS includes search radars to detect, identify, and track incoming threats, and a set of kinetic projectiles intended to destroy the threat or cause its early detonation. The Abrams base armor is expected to absorb post‑engagement threat residuals (threat by-products generated after the collision). The Trophy APS adds approximately 8,600 pounds to the platform. The Army has integrated the Trophy system into the tank’s situational awareness system.

Iron Fist – Light Decoupled APS
• The Iron Fist – Light Decoupled APS includes radars and optics to detect, identify, and track incoming threats, and a set of explosive projectiles intended to destroy or divert the threat. The system adds approximately 1,543 pounds to the platform. The fielded Bradley A3 does not generate sufficient power to operate the APS, while the Bradley A4 power components, currently under development, can support this APS solution.

Stryker APS
• The Army evaluated three different solutions for Stryker APS: Iron Curtain, Advanced Modular Armor Protection – Active Defense System, and the Trophy Medium Variant system. Each vendor had unique technical solutions with different countermeasure mechanisms. The Army did not select any of the three systems evaluated.

Via DOT&E FY 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Pentagon releases new details of Abrams upgrade program

The U.S. military has disclosed details on the development of an improved variant of America’s sole main battle tank that considered the best in the world.


The annual report issued by the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) has revealed fresh details of the M1A2 Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) version 3 (v3) main battle tank program.

The M1A2 SEP v3 would be almost unrecognizable to the tankers who served on its earliest incarnation. The new version could boast of improved fire control electronics mean the SEPv3’s gun can shoot faster and more accurately; the engine, drivetrain, and tracks have been updated for higher performance and to support the platform’s weight increase; it may even sport hubcaps and road arms manufactured by way of 3D printing.

The upgrades also include survivability enhancements including Next Evolution and advanced armor and reduction in vulnerability to Improvised explosive device (IED) threats (Reduction in vulnerability to remote-controlled IEDs).

According to the report, DOT&E approved an updated Abrams M1A2 SEP v3 Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) on December 28, 2018. The updated TEMP included revisions to planned Production Qualification Test events and the Follow-on operational Test and Evaluation scope.

Also added that in Fiscal Year 19, the Army concluded the M1A2 SEPv3 full-up system-level live fire testing. To complete the survivability assessment of the M1A2 SEPv3, the Army needs to execute the remaining live fire test series focused on addressing combat-induced vulnerabilities of stored ammunition and the modeling and simulation (M&S) effort focused on characterizing armor effectiveness across the operational envelope.

The Army expects to complete the M1A2 SEPv3 Live Fire Test and Evaluation program in the first quarter of FY20.

In FY19, the Army completed Full-Up, System-Level (FUSL) testing to assess the survivability of a combat-ready tank against IEDs, mines, and direct- and indirect-fire. The FUSL test series included 20 tests on 3 production-representative tanks.

Ammunition Compartment testing began in the fourth quarter of FY19 and will complete in 1Q FY20. These tests examine threats that perforate the tank armor and strike the ammunition compartment to assess the reaction of the stowed ammunition, and any resulting impacts to the crew.

The Abrams M1A2 SEPv3 survivability evaluation across operational engagement conditions will depend on live fire test data and models and simulations data. The Army is working on the validation and verification of the models and simulations tools critical to this evaluation.

Friday, January 31, 2020

Air Force Finally Releases New Images of Stealthy B-21 Future Bomber

New photorealistic renderings of the B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber have officially landed.

The Air Force together with the bomber's manufacturer, Northrop Grumman, published three new concepts of the next-generation bomber, showing the stealth aircraft in various hangars at bomber bases across the U.S.

One shows a concept of the B-21 tucked away in a hangar at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, currently a B-1B Lancer base; a second shows the aircraft at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, which currently houses the B-2 Spirit; and a final photo presenting the B-21 at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, also a B-1 base.

Last year, the service announced the B-21's first operational base would be at Ellsworth and would also host the bomber's first formal training unit. Whiteman and Dyess are expected to receive B-21 Raiders "as they become available," the service said at the time.


The B-21 is still years away. Officials have said first deliveries should begin in the mid-2020s, but have been careful not to broadcast too many other details in order to protect details about the B-21's technology.

While enthusiasts have compared the squat, sleek profile of the B-21 to the B-2 stealth bomber -- also developed by Northrop -- a specialist for military aviation at the Congressional Research Service was quick to point out one potential difference.

Altering the photo's contrast, "it becomes evident that what looks like the 'beak' is the port leading edge. The nose (as depicted) is not as sharp as B-2," Jeremiah "JJ" Gertler tweeted Friday.

The Air Force plans to buy roughly 100 bombers, but could end up purchasing more depending on the service's needs.

Officials are conveying the program's planned milestones and schedule of events to lawmakers on congressional defense committees, as well as top brass at the Pentagon. In August, Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Stephen "Seve" Wilson said he's counting the days until the bomber's first flight in December 2021.

In 2016, the Air Force announced it would name its next-generation LRS-B the Raider after the service's legendary Doolittle Raiders. The late World War II veteran Richard E. Cole, the last surviving Doolittle Raider, made the announcement that year.

The Air Force awarded Northrop the contract, initially worth $21.4 billion, in 2015. Total costs are expected to exceed $55 billion over the life of the program.

Monday, January 27, 2020

Hyundai Rotem favored to land $9 bil. tank deal with Poland


Hyundai Rotem was aiming to strike a $9 billion tank development deal with the Polish government. If the deal actually happens, it would mark the first time for the company to export its integrated defense technology overseas.

Hyundai Rotem is planning to partner with the Polish government to develop and produce 800 K2 Black Panther class tanks. The monetary value of the possible deal was unknown.

There are other prestigious tank developers such as the U.S. M1 Abrams, Russia's T-90 and England's Challenger 2 that could be secured but Poland's fundamental principle is to develop homegrown weaponry which suggests Hyundai Rotem is as a strong contender in the race.

"The official project bidding is expected to be announced in the first half of this year and we definitely will take part in the process. The total project is said to be divided into two stages to produce a total of 800 tanks," a Hyundai Rotem official said.

Hyundai Rotem officials met with Polish officials several times to explain the specifics of the qualifications and functions of the K2 Black Panther. In 2008, the South Korean company won a bid to sell K2 tanks to the Turkish government beating Germany, one of the world's leading tank manufacturers.

Earlier reports were that the Polish government partnered with Hyundai Rotem to produce next generation tanks scheduled to be stationed starting 2023. Poland also inked a deal with Hanwha Defense in 2016 to export 120 K-9 self-propelled howitzers, for which its performance was highly spoken of in the local region.

The K2 Black Panther finished development in 2008 and has been used by the Korean Army as its next generation tank since 2014. The K2s are capable of firing 120mm rounds while cruising at up to 70 kilometers an hour.

Sunday, January 26, 2020

Next-generation of combat: U.S. Army modernizing the Bradley

U.S. Army’s long-standing infantry fighting vehicle back on the testing range at YPG


YUMA, Ariz. (KYMA) - On any given day, there could be 60 to 100 military testings at Yuma Proving Ground (YPG). Currently, the U.S. Army is going through a very significant modernization process, testing for the next generation of combat.

Seven hours a day, four days a week, and hundreds of miles of paved roads, gravel, and cross country courses. The Army’s long-standing infantry fighting vehicle, the Bradley, is back on the training range at YPG.

Test officers are experimenting with advanced running gear.

YPG's test center is trying out a new suspension system to improve the ride quality when hauling soldiers through combat zones, as well as reducing maintenance time. Mark Schauer said, “The vehicle itself is still on the drawing board. But we’re testing components that may be used in future vehicles.”

Test officer, Jade Janis added, “There's nothing on this system that's the same as something in use already. It's all completely redesigned with newer technology."

The newly implemented suspension system offers a built-in height management system; giving the capability to raise and lower the vehicle from the driver's seat. YPG is involved in the developmental stages of next-generation combat vehicles.

This project could be tested for a least a year before moving to the next phase of approval. To see the Bradley and other combat vehicles up close, YPG invites you to its 2020 Open House event on February 15th.

Monday, January 20, 2020

Analisys of combat damage of Ukrainian Army armored vehicles at IAV2020.

Analisys of combat damage of Ukrainian Army armored vehicles at IAV2020.


The country actually engaged with Russia right now. Fasnicating feedback from Donbass shows huge predominance of losses being from artillery, not the sexier tanks or ATGM threats.

 The efficiency of Nizh ERA

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Modern Russian MANPADs - Igla-S and Verba

რუსული ხელის საზენიტო სისტემის, Игла-С-ის, დაპროგრამებული მსხვერვადობის მქონე საბრძოლო ქობინის მოქმედება
 Effect of the Programmable fragmentation warhead of russian MANPAD Igla-S

View full video